7 Comments
User's avatar
Ariel Patton's avatar

This is so fascinating!! I love that you covered so many aspects between beef and dairy, from cultural and technological differences, political aims, and diversification strategies

Abby ShalekBriski's avatar

Thanks, Ariel! I think sometimes we overlook the cultural differences between different types of producers and act like they're some sort of monolith instead of recognizing the divergence of business structures, priorities, and even management styles. Budgets and forecasts can tell us a lot! But I think sometimes a little anthropology could go a long way.

Quy Ma's avatar

Consumers can't tell the difference on tenderness, flavor, or juiciness. The market doesn't care how you got there after all, eh? Really fascinating piece, Abby.

Grant Mulligan's avatar

I've been wondering what will happen to ranching if synthetic beef takes off and what to do with grazing land that would come out of production. Artificial insemination sounds like a much more urgent threat to traditional beef raising practices. Fascinating article, Abby!

Abby ShalekBriski's avatar

Beef is still highly fragmented, both geographically and in scale. There’s a lot of flexibility for people to develop practices that align best with their land, herd genetics, and other constraints. I do think we are increasingly experiencing technologies that are cost effective and accessible to producers. Which is very cool!!

Synthetic Civilization's avatar

Very strong framing. The piece shows how technological control upstream can have consequences that look downstream like pricing conflict, lobbying conflict, and category confusion. A breeding tool did not just improve dairy economics; it altered the competitive geometry of the broader cattle industry. That is a much bigger story than “dairies found a better use for bull calves.”

Abby ShalekBriski's avatar

Thank you! This is a beautiful summary and one I wish I had said explicitly in my piece.